CAMPEN, Jacob van - b. 1595 Haarlem, d. 1657 Amersfoort - WGA

CAMPEN, Jacob van

(b. 1595 Haarlem, d. 1657 Amersfoort)

Dutch architect, one of the leaders of a group of architects who created a restrained architectural style that was suited to the social and political climate of the Netherlands. He was born in Haarlem on 2 February 1596 as the son of Gerritge Claes Jansz Berendr and the merchant Pieter Jacobsz. As both his parents’ families were wealthy burghers, Van Campen had good connections in the business and cultural worlds of Amsterdam and Haarlem.

Nothing is known about his training. He was long thought to have studied under Frans Pietersz de Grebber, and several eighteenth- and nineteenth-century biographers speculated that he had been taught by Peter Paul Rubens. Houbraken mentioned a visit to Italy, but this too remains unconfirmed. In 1614, Van Campen was registered as a master painter with the Haarlem Guild of St Luke. His father died a year later. Following his mother’s death in 1625, Jacob, as the eldest son, inherited her family estate, Randenbroek, near Amersfoort. Many subsequent documents refer to him as ‘Lord of Randenbroek’. It is not known whether he moved to the estate right away, but he did use it as his base from the early 1630s on. Though he never married, Van Campen had a son, Alexander, whose mother’s name is unknown.

In 1625, Jacob van Campen received his first commission for a building in Amsterdam. It was the first of many major projects, for which his influential relatives were partly to thank. His most prestigious commission was the Town Hall in Dam Square, Amsterdam, whose cornerstone was laid in 1648. In 1654, however, Van Campen abandoned the project following a dispute with the Amsterdam burgomasters, and subsequently returned to Randenbroek.

His friendship with Constantijn Huygens, which started in 1632, also brought numerous commissions. Van Campen assisted Huygens in building his own house (1634-1637), and designed the Mauritshuis (1634-1644) for Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen, with whom he was also on friendly terms. Through Huygens, who was secretary to the stadholder Frederik Hendrik, Van Campen received commissions for the court. He designed the decoration programmes for several palaces belonging to the stadholder and, in collaboration with Huygens, supervised the decoration of the Oranjezaal in Huis ten Bosch from 1647 to 1652.

Van Campen also remained active as a painter, one of his major projects being the canvases he executed for Huis ten Bosch. He was one of the team, including Jordaens and Lievens, who worked on the decoration of Huis ten Bosch, the royal villa on the outskirts of The Hague.His extant oeuvre is small, however, so he was presumably not prolific in this field. His early works in particular reflect an affinity with paintings by the Utrecht Caravaggists. Van Campen must have had connections in Utrecht, although there is no record of his having lived there.

Design for an interior
Design for an interior by

Design for an interior

Van Campen can be regarded as the most important initiator of classical architecture in Holland. We can see him as someone full of original ideas but lacking the patience to elaborate them in detailed plans for building. Hence only his sketches are extant.

Van Campen’s tendency to concentrate on the main principles and to neglect the details is clearly expressed in the present sketch for a wall decoration, probably for one of the transverse walls of a new gallery in BurenCasatle, for which he was brought in by Frederik Hendrik in 1636. The design shows a a rich, princely interior with a door frame and three panels for paintings, framed by festoons and putti.

Exterior view
Exterior view by

Exterior view

Jacob van Campen’s undisputed masterpiece was the Amsterdam Town Hall (now the royal palace). The ground plan consists of a rectangle with two interior courtyards centred on an extensive monumental hall, the Burghers’ Hall. The barrel vault and the fact that the hall stretches to the full height of the building gives it a distinctly religious feeling.

The exterior features two superimposed systems of Corinthian pilasters.

Exterior view
Exterior view by

Exterior view

Campen’s first known work is the fa�ade of a double house for the brothers Balthasar and Johan Coymans in Amsterdam (Keizersgracht 177). His fa�ade differs from the traditional narrow canal house with a stepped gable by having eight bays, of which the middle four project slightly. Constructed of brick, the fa�ade consists of a low ground-floor, above which are two storeys articulated by tiers of pilasters - Ionic below, Corinthian above - capped with a shallow attic. By Dutch standards the roof is rather low. This rigorous articulation of the fa�ade by pilasters was entirely new in the Netherlands. In addition, the pilasters do not stand on a plinth, as was usual.

With this design, which was immediately admired and incorporated in Salomon de Bray’s Architectura moderna (1631), van Campen introduced a new development in Dutch architecture that became known as Dutch Classicism.

The photo shows the house of the Coymans-families on Keizersgracht 177, opposite Westerkerk. (Top floor was added in the 19th century.)

Exterior view
Exterior view by

Exterior view

Campen’s first known work is the fa�ade of a double house for the brothers Balthasar and Johan Coymans in Amsterdam (Keizersgracht 177). His fa�ade differs from the traditional narrow canal house with a stepped gable by having eight bays, of which the middle four project slightly. Constructed of brick, the fa�ade consists of a low ground-floor, above which are two storeys articulated by tiers of pilasters - Ionic below, Corinthian above - capped with a shallow attic. By Dutch standards the roof is rather low. This rigorous articulation of the fa�ade by pilasters was entirely new in the Netherlands. In addition, the pilasters do not stand on a plinth, as was usual.

With this design, which was immediately admired and incorporated in Salomon de Bray’s Architectura moderna (1631), van Campen introduced a new development in Dutch architecture that became known as Dutch Classicism.

The photo shows the house of the Coymans-families on Keizersgracht 177, opposite Westerkerk. (Top floor was added in the 19th century.)

Exterior view
Exterior view by

Exterior view

With his design of Keizersgracht 177, Amsterdam van Campen introduced a new development in Dutch architecture that became known as Dutch Classicism. This movement reached maturity in 1633 with van Campen’s Mauritshuis in The Hague, designed for Johan Maurits, Count of Nassau-Siegen.

The building is free-standing, its fa�ade articulated on all sides by a colossal order of Ionic pilasters resting on a plinth storey. The fa�ade is surmounted by a pediment, above which rises a steeply inclined roof with two chimneys. The front fa�ade is seven bays wide; the outer ones and the middle three project slightly. The central projection with the entrance is entirely constructed of sandstone and is crowned with a pediment containing the Nassau coat of arms. The central projection of the rear, five-bay fa�ade is also in stone, as are the other decorative parts such as the festoons under the windows on the first floor.

Exterior view
Exterior view by

Exterior view

With his design of Keizersgracht 177, Amsterdam van Campen introduced a new development in Dutch architecture that became known as Dutch Classicism. This movement reached maturity in 1633 with van Campen’s Mauritshuis in The Hague, designed for Johan Maurits, Count of Nassau-Siegen.

The building is free-standing, its fa�ade articulated on all sides by a colossal order of Ionic pilasters resting on a plinth storey. The fa�ade is surmounted by a pediment, above which rises a steeply inclined roof with two chimneys. The front fa�ade is seven bays wide; the outer ones and the middle three project slightly. The central projection with the entrance is entirely constructed of sandstone and is crowned with a pediment containing the Nassau coat of arms. The central projection of the rear, five-bay fa�ade is also in stone, as are the other decorative parts such as the festoons under the windows on the first floor.

Exterior view
Exterior view by

Exterior view

After a few experiments in the 1620s with the application of classical pilaster orders, in the 1630s Jacob van Campen was given the opportunity to design the classical ideal of a three-dimensional, detached building: the Mauritshuis in The Hague. This urban villa for Count Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen beside the Hofvijver in The Hague, wit its colossal Ionic pilasters along its four outside walls, was the convincing example of the new classical architecture in Holland.

Exterior view
Exterior view by

Exterior view

With his design of Keizersgracht 177, Amsterdam van Campen introduced a new development in Dutch architecture that became known as Dutch Classicism. This movement reached maturity in 1633 with van Campen’s Mauritshuis in The Hague, designed for Johan Maurits, Count of Nassau-Siegen.

The building is free-standing, its fa�ade articulated on all sides by a colossal order of Ionic pilasters resting on a plinth storey. The fa�ade is surmounted by a pediment, above which rises a steeply inclined roof with two chimneys. The front fa�ade is seven bays wide; the outer ones and the middle three project slightly. The central projection with the entrance is entirely constructed of sandstone and is crowned with a pediment containing the Nassau coat of arms. The central projection of the rear, five-bay fa�ade is also in stone, as are the other decorative parts such as the festoons under the windows on the first floor.

Interior view
Interior view by

Interior view

Jacob van Campen’s undisputed masterpiece was the Amsterdam Town Hall (now the royal palace). The ground plan consists of a rectangle with two interior courtyards centred on an extensive monumental hall, the Burghers’ Hall. The barrel vault and the fact that the hall stretches to the full height of the building gives it a distinctly religious feeling.

View the plan of the main floor of the Town Hall, Amsterdam, as depicted in a 1661 print.

Interior view
Interior view by

Interior view

Jacob van Campen’s undisputed masterpiece was the Amsterdam Town Hall (now the royal palace). The ground plan consists of a rectangle with two interior courtyards centred on an extensive monumental hall, the Burghers’ Hall. The barrel vault and the fact that the hall stretches to the full height of the building gives it a distinctly religious feeling.

View the plan of the main floor of the Town Hall, Amsterdam, as depicted in a 1661 print.

Mercury, Argus and Io
Mercury, Argus and Io by

Mercury, Argus and Io

After his return from Italy to Haarlem, van Campen presumably was in contact with the Utrecht Caravaggisti, thanks to the large landed estate his family owned near Amersfoort, about twenty kilometres from Utrecht. His close connection to Amersfoort would have enabled him to stay abreast of their innovative paintings, and as he commuted between Amersfoort and Haarlem, he could have kept his colleagues informed of the latest news from Utrecht. Van Campen’s own rare paintings of this period indicate that at the time he was an accomplished Caravaggist.

The subject of the painting is taken from Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Io, the beautiful daughter of the river god Inachus, fell prey to the passion of Jupiter, who - in order to hide her from his jealous wife - turned the girl into a cow. The wily Juno talked her husband into giving her the fine-looking animal and had the hundred-eyed Argus guard it. Jupiter gave Mercury the task of killing the wicked guard. The inventive god approached the meadows and played songs on his pipe. The guard was charmed by the new and masterful melodies, and was lulled to sleep. Mercury beheads the sleeping guardian.

The Last Judgment
The Last Judgment by

The Last Judgment

Van Campen intended to paint a Last Judgment for the Tribunal in the Town Hall he designed for Amsterdam, but the plan was never realised. It is not known whether the painting in Amersfoort is identical with that intended for the Town Hall.

It is a remarkable feature of the painting that Christ’s hands do not show the crucifixion wounds; instead, he holds the bolts of lightning associated with the heathen Jupiter, the ruler of the Olympian deities.

Suggested listening (streaming mp3, 8 minutes):

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: Requiem K 626: Dies irae

Feedback