GALEN, Nicolaes van - b. ~1620 ?, d. ~1683 Hasselt - WGA

GALEN, Nicolaes van

(b. ~1620 ?, d. ~1683 Hasselt)

A picture in the Hasselt Town Hall bears the signature and date ‘N. van Galen F.A°.1657’. The painter is generally thought to have been Nicolaes van Galen, who is first recorded in Hasselt in 1647. He was the son of Juriaen van Galen and Rijkien van Ittersum, a woman of noble birth. In 1652, Nicolaes van Galen was in Kampen, where he had contact with the Amsterdam art dealer Jacob Ritsma. In 1676, he was the director of the hospital in Hasselt and in 1683 director of the municipal credit bank. It has been speculated that he was a member of the Hasselt patriciate and that he painted purely for his own pleasure.

Count Willem III Presides over the Execution of the Dishonest Bailiff in 1336
Count Willem III Presides over the Execution of the Dishonest Bailiff in 1336 by

Count Willem III Presides over the Execution of the Dishonest Bailiff in 1336

In 1657, the Hanseatic town of Hasselt in the north of the province of Overijssel acquired a larger than life painting which still occupies its original place in Hasselt’s late Gothic Town Hall. The scene it depicts is set indoors, but light pours in from the left, creating a number of vivid still-lifes. The represented scene is the last moment before the execution of a man. He is a bailiff, or magistrate, of a Dutch village, who purloined a cow, a peasant’s most cherished possession.The peasant, seeking justice from a higher authority, had made a long journey to put his case before Count William III. The count summoned the bailiff, found him guilty of abusing the power vested in him and had him beheaded on the spot.

Nothing is known about the artist but his name from the signature of this painting. No other paintings are known by him. However, experts consider this painting a masterpiece: the paint appears to have been applied with fluency and ease in clearly defined fields; the painter has captured the different textures of stone, velvet, lustrous satin, downy feathers and fur.

There is an interesting, alternative suggestion for the attribution of the painting. According to it, the Hasselt burgomasters may have reached an agreement with the guild that a ‘foreigner’ itinerant painter, Abraham van der Planck was to paint, but not sign, the picture. Van Galen, who was from the town, would place his signature on the work instead.

Feedback